NY Times Op-Ed Tells the Truth About Health Bill CBO Score

In Congress, health care on March 21, 2010 at 7:50 am

In other news, aliens have landed, President Obama has eschewed the teleprompter and everything east of the San Andreas Fault has fallen into the Atlantic Ocean…

As hard as it may be to believe, the New York Times somehow allowed an op-ed piece written by Douglas Holtz-Eakin, former head of the Congressional Budget Office, that tells the truth about the CBO’s analysis of the health reform bill before Congress today.

Holtz-Eakin confirms that the CBO functions like a calculator and makes no judgments as to feasibility. In other words “fantasy in/fantasy out”, as he puts it:

In reality, if you strip out all the gimmicks and budgetary games and rework the calculus, a wholly different picture emerges: The health care reform legislation would raise, not lower, federal deficits, by $562 billion.

Gimmick No. 1 is the way the bill front-loads revenues and backloads spending. That is, the taxes and fees it calls for are set to begin immediately, but its new subsidies would be deferred so that the first 10 years of revenue would be used to pay for only 6 years of spending…

…Finally, in perhaps the most amazing bit of unrealistic accounting, the legislation proposes to trim $463 billion from Medicare spending and use it to finance insurance subsidies. But Medicare is already bleeding red ink, and the health care bill has no reforms that would enable the program to operate more cheaply in the future. Instead, Congress is likely to continue to regularly override scheduled cuts in payments to Medicare doctors and other providers.

Removing the unrealistic annual Medicare savings ($463 billion) and the stolen annual revenues from Social Security and long-term care insurance ($123 billion), and adding in the annual spending that so far is not accounted for ($114 billion) quickly generates additional deficits of $562 billion in the first 10 years. And the nation would be on the hook for two more entitlement programs rapidly expanding as far as the eye can see.

The bottom line is that Congress would spend a lot more; steal funds from education, Social Security and long-term care to cover the gap; and promise that future Congresses will make up for it by taxing more and spending less.

Read the whole thing here.

  1. Isn’t it amazing (not really) how these idiots will take these numbers and skew them any which way they like?

  2. […] been sold. Already the bond market has reacted unfavorably because, unlike politicians who lie about the  numbers, the numbers themselves don’t […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: